Feature: SaveWCAL to file Petition for Review with Minnesota Supreme Court

This past weekend, the board of SaveWCAL met to review and discuss the recent decision by the Minnesota Court of Appeals regarding SaveWCAL's Petition To Redress Breach Of Trust.
The board has decided to file a Petition to Review with the Minnesota Supreme Court.Related Posts:Minnesota Court of Appeals issues WCAL decisionMN Court of Appeals changes venue [...]

Home » Courts » SaveWCAL files Appeal Reply Brief

SaveWCAL files Appeal Reply Brief

Thursday, June 25 2009 · 2 comments

in Courts

On June 24, 2009, SaveWCAL attorney Michael McNabb filed SaveWCAL's Reply Brief [PDF, 20 pages, 152 KB] in response to the respondent briefs filed by St. Olaf College and Minnesota Public Radio on June 15.

The Minnesota State Court of Appeals will now determine and set a date for oral arguments before the court.

SaveWCAL will post the date, time and location when we receive the court's notification.

The public is allowed to attend Court of Appeals hearings.

Related Posts:

Previous post:

Next post:

{ 2 comments… read them below or add one }

Ole '97 Monday, July 6 2009 at 9:25 am

Wow, this represents a lot of work and a lot of sharp thinking. I think that the citations of Judge Wolf are particularly powerful.
If the Court of Appeals actually studies what our attorney lays out before them, there's good hope. If they simply take on faith that good ol' "progressive" MPR and a Lutheran college would never be so felonious then we should despair not for ourselves but for the capacity of this system to deliver justice.

Reply

anonymous Friday, July 10 2009 at 11:13 am

It helps that many who graduated from St. Olaf can't reconcile their former trust in St. Olaf with what the college did in that sale. A church college? Shouldn't happen but did and they're still denying their errors. We can't look at the college in the same way we used to. The judges need to know of the disrespect many have for that church college's administration and regents. We need to prepare them for ruling against St.O, that it's ok to rule against them.

Reply

Leave a Comment